One must aim for a moral ideal, to reach a pragmatic and lasting  peace. 
There is a difference between the moral  responsibility of the individual and collective moral responsibility.
Individuals  need to be willing to take personal responsibility to keep to societal  norms.  Laws depend not only on societal based standards, but also upon  the moral agency of individuals to exhibit a willingness to follow the  law and not scoff at the law.
Collective moral  responsibility demands that we pursue peace at the societal level.
To  have a partner in peace you must have a co-practitioner of moral  agency.  That is, your partners in peace must have a sense of objective  morals or no peace is possible. The PA's "These are the rules: I get to  win!" leaves little room for negotiation or hope that any peace deal  would last long enough to even celebrate it. Like giving a schoolyard  bully a loaded sub machine gun, no good can come of it. So too, efforts  to pursue peace with unrepentant terrorists is in itself an abandonment  of collective moral responsibility.
The suffering of a  people and the perceived discontent of a people create a heavy burden to  society's collective sense of moral responsibility.  The pain at not  helping the underdog makes one willing to make extraordinary sacrifices  for peace.  Yet to do that in a way that fuels terror, not only fails to  meet that objective, it actually prevents true peace from planting  roots and enduring.
Contrary to the myth, a  discontented people is not the breeding ground for terror. The side that  the terrorists are rebelling against are not automatically the  aggressors. An individual terrorist is but the conveyor of terror, but a  morally and ethically corrupt society is its factory. In this sense,  the moral vacuum within the terror cell creates the burden upon their  own society, forcing reprisals against the entirety of their people, that  they may bear the price for the worship of terror by those citizens, now  terrorists, in the terror cell.  The group think of the terror cell  corrupts utterly, all involved, all the way down to each terrorist at  the individual level. Consequently, the leader of the terror cell is not  the main evil, but each terrorist member of the cell is a corrupting  force on the national moral fiber.
That means that when we feel the pain of a terroristic society, the phenomenon  is not mere reaction to propaganda. We are experiencing a mass  sensation of the real symptom, but not the true  cause, of the discontent.  The actual cause of the discontent is the  lack of morals of individual terrorists and also at the group level  within those isolated terror cells. The PA has made it their business to  place this moral vacuum at the political level of their nation's  leadership, who brazenly attempt to fuel more and more violence and  discontent. The PA leaders are terrorists in diplomatic clothing.
Yet we perceive the entire society in utter  chaos and hopelessness due to the "giant" who rules over the afflicted  people, even as the "afflicted" Palestinian Arabs work in the State of Israel and return  to their modern apartments, to shopping centers full of multifarious  foods and goods to choose from.
Until the alcoholic  realizes that his best friend is not alcohol, he has no hope for a cure.  Until the Palestinian leadership seek civilization building over  winning their every desire by hook or by crook, their people's hopes  will forever be dashed.
The PA's lawlessness is the bane of their people.   Weed out the corruption and blood lust by removing the PA from office,  and you give peace a chance to take hold in the Middle East, by the  grace of God.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 



 


No comments:
Post a Comment